Penn Bioethics Seminar | Stephanie Morain, PhD, MPH
12:00pm - 1:00pm • ZOOM: https://zoom.us/j/865415752
2020-04-07 12:00:00 2020-04-07 13:00:00 America/New_York Penn Bioethics Seminar | Stephanie Morain, PhD, MPH Reexamining the ethics of dual-role consent https://zoom.us/j/865415752 Classic statements of research ethics advise against permitting physician-investigators to obtain consent for research from patients with whom they have a concurrent treatment relationship. Reticence about “dual-role” consent reflects the view that distinct normative commitments govern research and care and that blurring the research-care boundary disserves patients. In this presentation, I will reexamine three arguments against “dual role” consent. I will then present pilot data from a preliminary empirical study examining the attitudes of physician-investigators regarding dual-role consent in the context of oncology. Approximately half of the session time will be reserved for group discussion and brainstorming regarding future project directions. Stephanie Morain, PhD, MPH Assistant Professor of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine Zoom is FREE for any participant. Please test out the link above before the meeting (you may join directly from your browser or download Zoom and join from the app). If you cannot make the lecture live, we can make a link to the recording available per request. What to expect during the Zoom lecture: Your audio will be automatically muted upon entering the meeting and your video will be disabled. You may switch your video on if you so choose. You can also unmute to ask questions or you use the chat box to submit a question. For other tips on online meeting etiquette, please see here: https://blogs.otago.ac.nz/zoom/zoom-etiquette-attendee/ ZOOM: https://zoom.us/j/865415752 Penn Medical EthicsReexamining the ethics of dual-role consent
https://zoom.us/j/865415752
Classic statements of research ethics advise against permitting physician-investigators to obtain consent for research from patients with whom they have a concurrent treatment relationship.
Reticence about “dual-role” consent reflects the view that distinct normative commitments govern research and care and that blurring the research-care boundary disserves patients. In this presentation, I will reexamine three arguments against “dual role” consent. I will then present pilot data from a preliminary empirical study examining the attitudes of physician-investigators regarding dual-role consent in the context of oncology. Approximately half of the session time will be reserved for group discussion and brainstorming regarding future project directions.
Stephanie Morain, PhD, MPH
Assistant Professor of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine
Zoom is FREE for any participant. Please test out the link above before the meeting (you may join directly from your browser or download Zoom and join from the app). If you cannot make the lecture live, we can make a link to the recording available per request.
What to expect during the Zoom lecture:
- Your audio will be automatically muted upon entering the meeting and your video will be disabled. You may switch your video on if you so choose. You can also unmute to ask questions or you use the chat box to submit a question.
- For other tips on online meeting etiquette, please see here: https://blogs.otago.ac.nz/zoom/zoom-etiquette-attendee/