April
7

Penn Bioethics Seminar | Stephanie Morain, PhD, MPH

12:00pm - 1:00pm • ZOOM: https://zoom.us/j/865415752

2020-04-07 12:00:00 2020-04-07 13:00:00 America/New_York Penn Bioethics Seminar | Stephanie Morain, PhD, MPH Reexamining the ethics of dual-role consent   https://zoom.us/j/865415752  Classic statements of research ethics advise against permitting physician-investigators to obtain consent for research from patients with whom they have a concurrent treatment relationship. Reticence about “dual-role” consent reflects the view that distinct normative commitments govern research and care and that blurring the research-care boundary disserves patients.  In this presentation, I will reexamine three arguments against “dual role” consent.  I will then present pilot data from a preliminary empirical study examining the attitudes of physician-investigators regarding dual-role consent in the context of oncology.  Approximately half of the session time will be reserved for group discussion and brainstorming regarding future project directions. Stephanie Morain, PhD, MPH Assistant Professor of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine   Zoom is FREE for any participant. Please test out the link above before the meeting (you may join directly from your browser or download Zoom and join from the app). If you cannot make the lecture live, we can make a link to the recording available per request. What to expect during the Zoom lecture: Your audio will be automatically muted upon entering the meeting and your video will be disabled. You may switch your video on if you so choose. You can also unmute to ask questions or you use the chat box to submit a question. For other tips on online meeting etiquette, please see here: https://blogs.otago.ac.nz/zoom/zoom-etiquette-attendee/ ZOOM: https://zoom.us/j/865415752 Penn Medical Ethics

Reexamining the ethics of dual-role consent

 

https://zoom.us/j/865415752 

Classic statements of research ethics advise against permitting physician-investigators to obtain consent for research from patients with whom they have a concurrent treatment relationship.

Reticence about “dual-role” consent reflects the view that distinct normative commitments govern research and care and that blurring the research-care boundary disserves patients.  In this presentation, I will reexamine three arguments against “dual role” consent.  I will then present pilot data from a preliminary empirical study examining the attitudes of physician-investigators regarding dual-role consent in the context of oncology.  Approximately half of the session time will be reserved for group discussion and brainstorming regarding future project directions.

Stephanie Morain, PhD, MPH
Assistant Professor of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine

 

Zoom is FREE for any participant. Please test out the link above before the meeting (you may join directly from your browser or download Zoom and join from the app). If you cannot make the lecture live, we can make a link to the recording available per request.

What to expect during the Zoom lecture:

  • Your audio will be automatically muted upon entering the meeting and your video will be disabled. You may switch your video on if you so choose. You can also unmute to ask questions or you use the chat box to submit a question.
  • For other tips on online meeting etiquette, please see here: https://blogs.otago.ac.nz/zoom/zoom-etiquette-attendee/

Loading tweets...