May
18

Penn Bioethics Seminar Series (PBS): Shawneequa Callier, JD, MA

12:00pm - 1:00pm • via Zoom

2021-05-18 12:00:00 2021-05-18 13:00:00 America/New_York Penn Bioethics Seminar Series (PBS): Shawneequa Callier, JD, MA Race to ancestry: How can advancements in genomics inform biomedical research laws and policies?   Shawneequa Callier, JD, MA, Associate Professor of Clinical Research and Leadership, The George Washington University  Registration required for all events.  Meeting link will be provided automatically upon sign-up. Sign up here: https://zoom.us/meeting/register/tJctf-itrDguE9JMtVc_nidOWPsrmCdkrunt   Abstract: The promotion of diversity and inclusion in genomics research can play a role in advancing equity in health outcomes, especially as researchers in diverse fields contextualize genomics in the broader health context to better understand the roles of environment, bias, racism, and other factors. Broad population labels can mask differences within population groups and similarities across populations, and super categories can promote racial stereotyping. Is there a danger that broad population labels, such as "African ancestry population," will become revised and problematic social and political classifications? How can advancements in genomics inform biomedical research laws, bioethics, and policies? Please email mary.pham@pennmedicine.upenn.edu to be added to the listserv to receive passwords and announcements. via Zoom Penn Medical Ethics

Race to ancestry: How can advancements in genomics inform biomedical research laws and policies?

 

Shawneequa Callier, JD, MA, Associate Professor of Clinical Research and Leadership, The George Washington University 

Registration required for all events. 
Meeting link will be provided automatically upon sign-up.

Sign up here: https://zoom.us/meeting/register/tJctf-itrDguE9JMtVc_nidOWPsrmCdkrunt

 

Abstract: The promotion of diversity and inclusion in genomics research can play a role in advancing equity in health outcomes, especially as researchers in diverse fields contextualize genomics in the broader health context to better understand the roles of environment, bias, racism, and other factors. Broad population labels can mask differences within population groups and similarities across populations, and super categories can promote racial stereotyping. Is there a danger that broad population labels, such as "African ancestry population," will become revised and problematic social and political classifications? How can advancements in genomics inform biomedical research laws, bioethics, and policies?




Please email mary.pham@pennmedicine.upenn.edu to be added to the listserv to receive passwords and announcements.

Loading tweets...