April
20

Penn Bioethics Seminar Series (PBS): Naomi Scheinerman, PhD

12:00pm - 1:00pm • via Zoom

2021-04-20 12:00:00 2021-04-20 13:00:00 America/New_York Penn Bioethics Seminar Series (PBS): Naomi Scheinerman, PhD Meaningful Engagement in Regulating Biotechnologies  through Mini-Public Deliberation   Naomi Scheinerman, PhD, Fellow in Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications of Genetics and Genomics, Medical Ethics and Health Policy, PSOM Registration required for all events.  Meeting link will be provided automatically upon sign-up. Sign up here: https://zoom.us/meeting/register/tJUuc-ugpzkvEtHm8L_7nw9tHhrpXySGvTKd Designed to manage risks and ensure the safety of industry’s innovations, regulatory agencies have long been objects of interest for bioethicists due to the significant power and influence they have over new and emerging biotechnologies’ impact on people’s lives. However, agencies’ ability to regulate effectively suffer from lack of adequate pathways for inclusivity due to expert-based design, captured interests, and barriers to entry during the comment process. I argue that this notorious “democratic deficit” can be reduced by importing a recent institutional innovation called “mini-publics” (bodies of randomly selected individuals) within the regulatory process earlier in rulemaking in order to add needed diversity of views and lived experiences. In particular, in accordance with the Coordinated Framework for the Regulation of Biotechnology’s purported interest in engaging the public, this procedural innovation can help the agencies under its purview, such as the FDA, USDA, and EPA achieve their missions of creating considered judgment of risks and values of gene editing applications. Please email mary.pham@pennmedicine.upenn.edu to be added to the listserv to receive passwords and announcements. via Zoom Penn Medical Ethics

Meaningful Engagement in Regulating Biotechnologies 
through Mini-Public Deliberation

 

Naomi Scheinerman, PhD, Fellow in Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications of Genetics and Genomics, Medical Ethics and Health Policy, PSOM

Registration required for all events. 
Meeting link will be provided automatically upon sign-up.
Sign up here: 
https://zoom.us/meeting/register/tJUuc-ugpzkvEtHm8L_7nw9tHhrpXySGvTKd

Designed to manage risks and ensure the safety of industry’s innovations, regulatory agencies have long been objects of interest for bioethicists due to the significant power and influence they have over new and emerging biotechnologies’ impact on people’s lives. However, agencies’ ability to regulate effectively suffer from lack of adequate pathways for inclusivity due to expert-based design, captured interests, and barriers to entry during the comment process. I argue that this notorious “democratic deficit” can be reduced by importing a recent institutional innovation called “mini-publics” (bodies of randomly selected individuals) within the regulatory process earlier in rulemaking in order to add needed diversity of views and lived experiences. In particular, in accordance with the Coordinated Framework for the Regulation of Biotechnology’s purported interest in engaging the public, this procedural innovation can help the agencies under its purview, such as the FDA, USDA, and EPA achieve their missions of creating considered judgment of risks and values of gene editing applications.


Please email mary.pham@pennmedicine.upenn.edu to be added to the listserv to receive passwords and announcements.

Loading tweets...